[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

categories: Re: Reals a la Eudoxus (updated from re: Tate Reals)



I don't want to be disagreeable, but it seems clear to me that this
construction gives Cauchy reals, not Dedekind reals and only the latter
can be said to go back to Eudoxus.  Indeed, given a nearly function f,
with bound B on the near linearity, it is easy to see that |(fn/n) -
(fm/m)| =< B(1/n + 1/m) so that the sequence fn/n is Cauchy.

Michael